THE spinning Quantum Energy Generator is DEAD…
Yeah sure thing…
HOWEVER: The ZERO POINT ENERGIES (ZPE) as the original TESLA QEG was drawing from, are now a HOT TOPIC.
Lets talk about
NEW THINGS
Lets not dwell too long on what did not work … SAD but true.. Many tried, some even died.. But new days dawn and we are free to talk about all things ZPT the Neo-QEGz.
Top RESEARCH:
- Yes you know its coming.
- Yes you know there has lots been suppressed
- Yes you know there have ‘likely’ people whom have died to bring this information to you too soon some might say.
Anthuriums
Cactus
History speaks:
In SO many places peeps are talking about the ZERO Point ENERGY field and ZERO POINT TECHNOLOGIES these days (again/still). However I believe that since we are now officially in the Aquarian Age proper, it is inevitable that these technologies are pushed out to the public in more ways than ‘THEY’ can control.
In writing this text here I will ask Perplexity AI for a DEEP-RESEACH about the QEG days and why it/they had so much trouble.
Q: Ok so Perplexity please tell us about the good old days of the Quantum Energy Generator and why do you think it failed to gain traction? (I used the Deep Research setting) and I have changed nothing of the output, it is raw from Perplexity.
A: It takes a few minutes to gather sources, analyze data, and create your report.
[[[ I am inserting this screen shot and asking Perplexity
to simplify output into a WordPress blog post ]]]
Creating a plan…
The query asks for information about the history of the Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) and analysis of why it failed to gain widespread adoption.
Research will need to cover what the QEG was, its origins, claimed functionality, scientific reception, and factors that prevented its mainstream acceptance.
The Rise and Fall of the Quantum Energy Generator: A Case Study in Free Energy Claims
The Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) emerged in 2014 as a promising alternative energy technology that garnered significant interest from enthusiasts worldwide. Despite initial excitement and widespread circulation of its open-source plans, the QEG ultimately failed to deliver on its revolutionary claims. This report examines the history of the QEG, its technical claims, the community that formed around it, and the fundamental reasons why it failed to gain mainstream traction or scientific acceptance.
Origins and Development of the QEG
The Quantum Energy Generator was presented as a modern implementation of one of Nikola Tesla’s patented electrical generator designs. According to promotional materials, the QEG prototype could continuously produce 10-15 kW of electrical power while providing either 120V or 230-240V single-phase output1. What made the QEG particularly remarkable was its claimed operating principle: as a high-powered self-resonant oscillator that, once running, would require only a small fraction of its output power to sustain operation, making it an “over-unity” device1.
The QEG was developed and promoted by an organization called “Fix the World,” led by Hope Girl (also known as Hope Moore or Naima Feagin). In March 2014, the original QEG plans were made open-source, with a revised build manual released a year later in March 20155. During this period, the creators conducted international workshops, most notably in Morocco where a prototype was reportedly built in April/May 20146.
The development timeline reveals an interesting progression:
- January 2014: Initial announcement of the QEG project
- March 2014: Release of open-source plans
- April/May 2014: Construction of a prototype in Morocco and creation of a test report
- March 2015: Release of a revised 75-page build manual
- July 2016: Launch of a membership-based “QEG Academy”
By 2015, the creators claimed that over 200,000 people had downloaded the QEG plans, more than 1,000 individuals had invested time and money in seeing the technology become reality, and approximately 100 people and groups were actively building their own QEGs5. This represented a substantial grassroots community interest in the technology.
Technical Claims and the Scientific Response
The QEG’s core claim was its ability to operate as an “over-unity” device, producing more energy output than energy input. According to the documentation, the QEG operated through principles of resonance, generating high-voltage AC that was then transformed into usable line voltage1. The device purportedly achieved this through a combination of resonance phenomena and what advocates describe as “quantum” effects.
The Physics of Resonance
While resonance is a legitimate physical phenomenon (as described in Wikipedia’s entry on resonance), the application of resonance principles alone cannot create energy from nothing7. In resonant systems, amplitude increases as damping decreases, and the Q factor describes how under-damped an oscillator is – with higher Q values indicating lower energy loss relative to stored energy7. However, even high-Q systems must obey conservation of energy laws.
The scientific community’s response to the QEG was overwhelmingly skeptical. This skepticism stemmed primarily from the QEG’s contradiction of the first law of thermodynamics, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed in an isolated system. As one Reddit discussion explains, devices that appear to generate “free energy” are typically taking energy from some unaccounted source or involve measurement errors2.
The Free Energy Movement Context
The QEG did not exist in isolation but was part of a broader “Free Energy Movement” and “Open Source Energy Network.” These movements align themselves with open-source thinking while addressing alternative energy production9. They typically comprise inventors and activists who develop alternative energy solutions outside conventional energy sectors and academia9.
Such movements often incorporate conspiracy theories about energy suppression. Proponents frequently claim that viable pollution-free energy technologies have been suppressed by governments and corporations protecting their interests. As one source states, the movement includes people who “have developed alternative energy solutions and technologies (such as the water car) outside the conventional energy sector and academia”9.
The Psychology of Free Energy Believers
Understanding why the QEG attracted followers despite scientific impossibility requires examining the psychology behind free energy belief systems. Perpetual motion machine inventors and free energy advocates often distrust established physics laws, hoping to find loopholes, or believe they’ve discovered new phenomena not covered by existing laws10.
As Joel Lagace explains in a YouTube video on “Over Unity,” proponents often reject accusations of breaking thermodynamic laws by claiming to introduce “multiple sources in the system” or by “manipulating external energy systems”8. This perspective allows believers to maintain faith in free energy concepts despite scientific criticism.
Why the QEG Failed to Gain Traction
Despite initial enthusiasm and significant community interest, the QEG ultimately failed to gain mainstream traction for several crucial reasons:
1. Lack of Independent Verification
Perhaps the most significant factor in the QEG’s failure was the complete absence of independent verification of its functionality. While the creators published detailed manuals and test reports, no credible laboratory ever confirmed that the device functioned as claimed6. The only documentation came from the creators themselves, creating a critical gap in scientific credibility.
2. Violation of Fundamental Physics
The QEG’s core claim of being an “over-unity” device fundamentally contradicted established laws of physics. As explained in multiple search results, generating more energy than consumed violates the first law of thermodynamics2. This scientific impossibility made the QEG inherently unviable, regardless of how it was marketed.
3. Pattern of Failed Promises
The timeline of the QEG reveals a pattern common to many failed free energy devices: initial excitement, lack of concrete results, shifting focus, and eventual abandonment. Despite claims in 2015 that they were “very close” to a working prototype and predicting rapid mass production, there’s no evidence these goals ever materialized. By 2022, the original creators had apparently pivoted to selling EMF protection products in Morocco rather than focusing on the QEG[appendix].
4. Transition from Open-Source to Commercial Model
The QEG project’s evolution from fully open-source to a paid subscription model (“QEG Academy”) by 2016 marked a significant shift in approach. This transition may have alienated some supporters who were attracted to the original open-source philosophy, while simultaneously failing to provide the scientific credibility needed for mainstream acceptance.
Legacy and Lessons
The QEG fits into a historical pattern of alternative energy devices that follow a predictable trajectory: initial excitement based on revolutionary claims, lack of scientific validation, funding challenges, conspiracy theories about suppression, and eventual failure without verified working products. Similar examples include Steorn’s “Orbo” and numerous other claimed breakthrough technologies that ultimately failed to deliver.
The QEG case provides valuable insights into how pseudoscientific energy claims gain initial popularity despite scientific impossibility. Key indicators include vague technical descriptions, lack of testable results, absence of peer review, and failure to show significant progress over time.
Conclusion
The Quantum Energy Generator represents a fascinating case study in the persistent allure of “free energy” technologies despite their scientific implausibility. While the QEG attracted significant interest and built a substantial community during its peak between 2014-2016, it ultimately failed to gain traction due to fundamental scientific impossibilities, lack of independent verification, and a pattern of unfulfilled promises.
The QEG story demonstrates the power of open-source communities and the desire for revolutionary energy solutions, but also highlights the importance of scientific verification and the immutable nature of physical laws. As new alternative energy claims continue to emerge, the QEG serves as a reminder that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence – particularly when they challenge fundamental principles of physics.
Related
What were the main challenges faced by the Quantum Energy Generator in gaining widespread acceptance
How did the Quantum Energy Generator compare to traditional energy generation methods in terms of efficiency
Were there any significant financial or logistical barriers that hindered the adoption of the Quantum Energy Generator
How did the open-source nature of the Quantum Energy Generator impact its development and dissemination
What role did Nikola Tesla’s designs play in the development of the Quantum Energy Generator
Watch this space
AND
Let the
REVEALINGS BEGIN
